Chair / GC / EA Handoff
Route the AI governance question without creating another internal project.
This page gives a chair, general counsel, chief of staff, or executive assistant the minimum context needed to decide whether Touch Stone belongs in the next governance conversation.
Who Uses This
Three roles. One clean handoff.
Chair or Committee Lead
Use this when the board needs to know whether AI oversight is visible, assigned, and supported by a usable record.
General Counsel
Use this when legal, disclosure, vendor, workforce, or regulatory exposure has moved beyond policy language into operating evidence.
Executive Assistant or Chief of Staff
Use this to route the question with the right context and without forcing the principal through a generic intake process.
What To Send
The first note only needs six facts.
- Principal name and role.
- Organization and board or committee context.
- The AI governance question in plain language.
- Timing pressure: board meeting, audit, investment decision, disclosure, regulatory review, or leadership session.
- Who should be included: chair, CEO, GC, CFO, CHRO, CIO/CTO, COO, CRO, or committee staff.
- Preferred reply path and calendar constraints.
What Happens Next
A direct reply. A defined next step. No qualification queue.
Glenn reviews the note directly and responds with the next useful question. The first decision is simple: request the Chairman’s Briefing, discuss a role-specific playbook, scope an Executive Lab, or decide that no engagement is needed.